Simplicity in design is not a goal by itself, but a tool for better experience. The goal is the need of the moment: to sell a product, to express an opinion, to teach a concept, to entertain. While elegance and optimal function in design frequently overlaps with simplicity, there are times that simplicity is not only not possible but hurts usability. Yet many designers do not understand this, and over the years, I’ve seen the desire to “keep it simple, stupid,” lead to poor UX.<\/p>\n
I was therefore glad to see Francisco Inchauste’s well-thought, longer version<\/a> of Einstein’s “as simple as possible, but no simpler” remark. <\/p>\n From the column:<\/p>\n As an interactive designer, my first instinct is to simplify things. There is beauty in a clean and functional interface. But through experience I\u2019ve found that sometimes I can\u2019t remove every piece of complexity in an application. The complexity may be unavoidably inherent to the workflow and tasks that need to be performed, or in the density of the information that needs to present. By balancing complexity and what the user needs, I have been able to continue to create successful user experiences.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Plus, as I’ve commented before, messy is fun<\/a>!<\/p>\n